Conversation (242)
Sort byNewest
    • Sentencing reform makes sense, particularly because it adds tax payers to the Federal tax base.  Can we find a way to get qualifying non-threat people out of Federal penal facilities and onto Federal tax rolls?  The same applies to illegals, particularly DACA entrants.  Can we create a legal pathway to an IRS Form 1040?  Keeping folks in penury for failed 'good ideas' makes no sense.  Conversely, MS-13 and other criminal elements entering this country legally or illegally should face the same government prosecutorial attention as any other criminal.  Let them discover the joy of the US penal system.
      Reply
      Share
      Report
      • Is Mike Lee really the person to be writing about criminal justice reform when he engaged in a reletless, repetitive and partisan character assassination attempt to destroy the political career of a woman? There was no justification for the length of time or the amount of money spent on their expedition to find anything they could possibly find to discredit a politician simply for being a Democrat and a strong presidential candidate. When an investigation was coming up short, they dropped inuendos and fueled conspiracy theories.
        Reply
        Share
        Report
        1
        • This writer lost me with his comment that violent crime increased in Obama’s last two years and decreased in Trump’s first two. Beside the fact that neither president had anything to do with these statistics, if this guy isn’t educated enough to know that two years of anything is trivially insignificant in discussing crime trends, anything else he has to say is more than likely just some more Fox News agenda garbage. How about we talk about the real problem here: Republicans have been using fear of crime and tough sentencing to get elected for decades. The trouble now is, hurting people who break the rules is really, really expensive, and it has to be paid for by taxes. And we know how the GOP feels about taxes. This guy couldn’t care less about how many lives tough on crime policies have ruined. All the GOP cares about is money. Privatize all the prisons and watch this supposed GOP desire for reform disappear.
          Reply
          Share
          Report
          1
            1. The opinion is super vague like all Op-Eds and articles on criminal justice reform. Never any specifics as to what the actual changes are to be. Just a lot a vague platitudes about appeals to common sense. I assume this is just about reducing federal drug penalities; or is it more? No idea. Nothing in the piece about the scope of the legislation.
            2. A singular piece of anecdotal evidence to support the argument - Weldon Angelos. What are some of the other aspects Mr. Angelos' case? Why did he get onto the the Federal radar in the first place? Three itty-bitty bags of cannabis and local DA or SA didn't prosecute. Why? What were his priors? How many other counts were dismissed in exchange for the plea of guilty? Oh, and when did this take place? The federal sentencing guidelines have been pruned back repeatedly over the years. Was this 20 years ago or last week?
            3. It's irrelevant that other nations have so many fewer people incarcerated. Every Nation has different circumstances. Some have very old cultures or very homogeneous populations where people really do have shared values. Or some nations are super harsh totalitarian states that will mess you up if you commit a crime. Oh, China has 2 billion people and only only 5 guys in prison, Great! that's because committing crime in China will lead to very bad things.
            Reply
            Share
            Report
            • Edited
              Prison reform = Prison for law abiding people. Releasing violent predator psychopaths seems to be a trend now with the ruling class. A populace cowering in the face of evil makes the ruling class much more powerful. Chaos, murder and mayhem have always been tools of the left to promote totalitarianism. Let's debunk the myth of so-called "non-violent" inmates. It is practically impossible to ever see the inside of a jail cell without committing multiple violent felonies. There are NO low-level druggies in prison. All crime is violent crime. This is about nothing but money and power. Liberals have made it so costly to house inmates that politicians are desperate to get that money to reward illegal alien predators and other Democrat voters. .
              Reply
              Share
              Report
              2
              • superMAGAman
                Amazingly wrong on every front. Yes, there are non-violent crimes. In fact, it's almost impossible to avoid committing felonies, because the laws are too numerous to know. Therefore, yes, there are non-violent criminals, especially for drug use. And therefore, trying to make room for all the druggies (especially those serving mandatory minimums) means you have to let some of the truly violent criminals out to cut down on over-crowding. By the way, it was the Democrats that started the drug war (Uniform State Narcotics act of 1934 under FDR), and instituted mandatory minimums. Like many things, the Democrats want you to believe they've always been fighting against the drug war, and Republicans were always fighting for it. The truth is that the biggest imprisonment bill was the "three strikes, you're out" bill that Hillary sold with the phrase "super predators".
                Reply
                Share
                Report
                2
              • profelwood
                So decriminalize marijuana use. Problem solved. There are no low level "druggie"inmates for drug possession. There are many inmates who are violent criminals but drug possession is the only way to nail them. Crime is violence. Ask the victims.
                Reply
                Share
                Report
                1
            • Prison and Justice reform. These go hand and hand, one without the other is impossible. lets start with why we incarcerate people, we incarcerate for every type of offense. I believe that this is wrong, we need to incarcerate only for public safety. Crime and punishment need to go hand in hand, would you have your kid mow the lawn and shovel the driveway because he did not complete his homework? Hopefully you answered no, you would have taken time away from one of their other activities to give more time for the homework, with a discussion on why homework needs to be completed. Someone steals something they should have to repay that debt. ...See more
              Reply
              Share
              Report
              3
              • We have a greater proportion of our people locked up than any country on Earth, yet we are less safe than any other first world country. Maybe we should try to learn from how other nations are handling crime.
                Reply
                Share
                Report
                2
                • HeyyNonnyMouse
                  Sure, as long as the solution doesn't involve gun control, reducing income inequality, school funding, reducing religious beliefs, or any of those other "liberal" ideas that other countries do. Basically as long as the answer is tax cuts for the rich, were happy to learn from other countries.
                  Reply
                  Share
                  Report
                  1
                • Spanglertastic
                  Yep, let's stick with freedom, which has consistently been shown to improve everyone's life, instead of worshiping government control, which never lives up to its hype, and usually creates even bigger problems than the ones it's trying to solve.
                  Reply
                  Share
                  Report
                  3
                • profelwood
                  You do worship government control, you just worship it when it is pushing your personal beliefs. All this talk of freedom is just a farce.
                  Reply
                  Share
                  Report
              Show More Comments...